THE HARBINGER OF BAAL APPEARS IN AMERICA

by JENNIFER LECLAIRE

The Sign Of Baal Appears In New York City! See the Unveiling with Jonathan Cahn

In ancient Israel, the people turned away from God in their prosperity. They turned to the false god of Baal, even offering up their children as sacrifices on this demonic altar.

"They called what was evil good and what was good evil," says Cahn, author of best-selling books The Harbinger and newest title, The Book of Mysteries. "They drove God out of their government, out of their culture, out of the lives of their children. They persecuted and hunted down the righteous."

Cahn goes on to point out how nine harbingers of national destruction that appeared in ancient Israel are now appearing on American soil—many of them in New York City. One especially blatant sign just appeared in New York City—the arch that leads to the temple of Baal.

Watch the entire video to understand the spiritual dynamics behind this shocking event.

KANSAS POLICE: 'YOU CAN'T PRAY IN YOUR OWN HOME'

by BOB ESCHLIMAN

Mary Ann Sause, a former nurse, was threatened with arrest after police forced their way into her home and demanded that she stop praying—over a simple noise complaint. (Submitted photo)

According to attorneys representing a Louisburg, Kan., woman, police forced their way into her home, telling her the Constitution was "just a piece of paper" that "doesn't work here," before telling her she could not pray in her home.

All over a simple noise complaint about her radio being turned up too loudly.

According to attorneys for the First Liberty Institute, which are representing Mary Anne Sause, a Catholic former nurse, she was home late at night when the police came to her home. When they knocked at the door, they did not identify themselves as police, and with her front door's "peephole" inoperative, she did not open the door.

They returned later and identified themselves as police, then demanded to be let in to her apartment. As they berated her for not letting them in the first time, they refused to give a specific reason why they were there, as is required. When she showed them a copy of the Constitution and Bill of Rights given to her by her congressman, one of the officers mockingly said, "that's nothing, it's just a piece of paper—[it] doesn't work here."

The officers continued to act in a belligerent manner toward Sause, telling the terrified woman she should prepare to go to jail. She asked if she could pray beforehand, and while one of the officers granted her request, the other told her she could not pray in her own home.

"No American should ever be told that they cannot pray in their own home," First Liberty Institute Associate Counsel Stephanie Taub said. "The right to pray in the privacy of one's own home is clearly protected by the First Amendment."

According to the officers' version, they said her prayer was interfering with their ability to ask her questions—in other words, to continuing berating and harassing her—over the simple noise complaint. She was ultimately given a citation to appear over the violation, and not arrested as the officers had threatened.

"The police are supposed to make you feel safe, but I was terrified that night," she said. "It was one of the worst nights of my life."

When First Liberty attorneys took her case to federal court, the district court threw out the complaint entirely, denying Sause her day in court. Her attorneys have now filed a brief with the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking to have the case remanded back to the lower court with instructions to hear the case.

"As Ms. Sause explained in her complaint, two Louisburg police officers abused their power and violated her First Amendment rights by ordering her—under threat of arrest and without any legitimate law-enforcement justification—to stop praying in her own home," said attorney Bradley G. Hubbard, a litigation associate with Gibson Dunn, the local law firm assisting with the case. "We urge the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit to reverse the district court's decision and allow Ms. Sause a meaningful day in court as she attempts to vindicate her constitutionally-protected religious liberty."

'ATHEIST DELUSION' MOVIE 'DESTROYS ATHEISM WITH ONE QUESTION' SAYS EVANGELIST RAY COMFORT

BY STOYAN ZAIMOV

“There is no life after death" poster for "The Atheist Delusion" movie by Ray Comfort, set to premiere at the Ark Encounter in Kentucky on  October 22, 2016

Evangelist Ray Comfort's "The Atheist Delusion" movie, which claims that it's able to "destroy atheism with one scientific question," is set to premiere at the Ark Encounter, a life-sized Noah's Ark theme park in Kentucky.

"From the start, we were concerned that people wouldn't take seriously a movie that 'destroys atheism with one scientific question.' But it does exactly that by scientifically confirming the existence of God. Having a respected, scientifically based organization like Answers in Genesis being willing to premiere it is such an honor," Comfort said in a statement shared with CP.

While Living Waters Publications, Comfort's ministry, has claimed that thousands have already seen the movie thanks to pre-release paid downloads, Oct. 22 at the Ark is set to be the official release date.

Comfort admitted that the movie is not likely to change the minds of "the average prod and closed-minded atheist."

"But countless others, tempted to believe the ridiculous lie of atheism, are open-minded, and will be convinced by seeing the irrefutable proof for the existence of God," he added.

The evangelist said back in July in an interview with Hemant Mehta of "The Friendly Atheist" blog that his new film seeks to warn people that Hell is a very real place.

"I believe with every ounce of my being that Hell is a very real place. I know that is offensive and that it almost always brings scorn with it. It was Penn Jillette who asked how much we would have to hate someone if we believed that Hell was real and didn't warn him," Comfort said at the time, referring to his conversation with the atheist celebrity magician.

In a later interview, Comfort insisted that Christians need to believe that the accounts in Genesis are literally true, or else they would be calling "Jesus a liar."

Ham, a Young Earth Creationist who has also been critical of atheists and defended the literal interpretation of Genesis, has made similar claims. Back in August he took aim at a Lutheran-ELCA pastor who claimed that the account of Noah is not real history.

"If Noah is a myth, then so are all those listed in Hebrews 11, like Abraham, Isaac, Joseph, Moses, and others. Would the pastor rather have children be taught evolution as fact and Creation as myth? Millstone warning in Mark 9:42! Genesis is history," Ham wrote at the time.

"The Atheist Delusion" film will be streamed live on the website Atheist Movie.com at 8 p.m. ET on Oct. 22 and will also be released on YouTube.

"The world premiere will be highly evangelistic, as well as thoroughly encouraging, equipping, and inspiring to seasoned believers," Comfort added, sharing his hopes that millions will watch the movie.

TRUMP TO NETANYAHU: "I WILL RECOGNIZE JERUSALEM AS THE CAPITAL OF ISRAEL"

by ALANA WISE/REUTERS

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump meeting at the Trump Tower in New York, September 25, 2016. (Kobi Gideon/GPO)

U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on Sunday told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that if elected, the United States would recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the campaign said, marking a potential dramatic shift in U.S. policy.

During the meeting that lasted more than an hour at Trump Tower in New York, Trump told Netanyahu that under his administration, the United States would "recognize Jerusalem as the undivided capital of the State of Israel."

While Israel calls Jerusalem its capital, few other countries accept that, including the United States. Most nations maintain embassies in Tel Aviv.

Palestinians want East Jerusalem, captured by Israel in a 1967 war, as capital of the state they aim to establish alongside Israel in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Netanyahu held a separate meeting later on Sunday that lasted just under an hour with Democrat Hillary Clinton, Trump's rival in the Nov. 8 U.S. election.

Clinton emphasized her commitment to the U.S.-Israel relationship and her plan to take the relationship to the next level, according to a statement from her campaign.

She also talked about her commitment to a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict "that guarantees Israel's future as a secure and democratic Jewish state with recognized borders and provides the Palestinians with independence, sovereignty, and dignity," according to the statement.

"Secretary Clinton reaffirmed her opposition to any attempt by outside parties to impose a solution, including by the U.N. Security Council," the statement said.

During the meeting with Trump, the Republican candidate's campaign said he agreed with Netanyahu that peace in the Middle East could only be achieved when "the Palestinians renounce hatred and violence and accept Israel as a Jewish State."

The Trump campaign said he and Netanyahu discussed "at length" Israel's border fence, cited by Trump in reference to his own controversial immigration policies, which include building a wall on the U.S.- Mexico border and temporarily banning Muslims from entering the country.

Other regional issues, including the fight against Islamic State, U.S. military assistance to Israel - "an excellent investment" - and the Iran nuclear deal, which both parties have criticized, were also discussed.

VIDANGEL VS. DISNEY: PTC, MOVIEGUIDE DEFEND FAMILY-FRIENDLY STREAMING SITE AS LAWFUL

BY KEVIN PORTER

Walt Disney Company Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Robert Iger announces Disney's new standards for food advertising on their programming targeting kids and families at the Newseum in Washington, June 5, 2012. REUTERS/Gary Cameron/File Photo

VidAngel, a company that enables the filtering of adult content from TV and movies, is facing a lawsuit from some of the biggest names in film: the Walt Disney Company, Lucasfilms, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Bros. The four industry giants claim that the video streaming service is infringing on its copyrighted material.

According to the lawsuit, Disney and the plaintiffs are suing for copyright infringement and for violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The plaintiffs also contend that the Utah-based movie filtering service does not have authorization to use its films and has failed to pay for the licensing of titles.

The irony is that VidAngel, a company intending to help families filter unwanted content, is being sued by Disney, a film and TV entity known to produce some of the more family-friendly material.

Several highly-regarded TV and film watchdogs are chiming in on the issue.

Asked if he thought VidAngel was pirating content, Parents Television Council (PTC) President Tim Winter was clear about his convictions, telling The Christian Post during an interview on Monday:

"The answer is, 'No.' They (VidAngel) are doing it (streaming content) lawfully. They are doing it properly," he said.

"What they're doing is they're actually buying physical copies of the DVDs, and then as a subscriber, you then purchase from them that DVD copy, and then you have the right to stream it because you own it, you bought it, and then what you are able to do is that you are able to sell it back to VidAngel for part of the purchase price."

Winter told CP that VidAngel's initial point of sale is key. "So it's a very important distinction that the VidAngel procedure is including. It's not just they're taking some movie and streaming it for profit without giving Disney any money. They're actually paying Disney for a copy of the DVD."

The PTC president said Disney's current business structure forces VidAngel to take the risk of paying for thousands of DVDs, not knowing if customers will make a purchase.

Winter added that reselling DVDs was also a big risk. "VidAngel has to buy a bunch of copies and hope that they've estimated correctly about how many that are not going to be reselling."

MovieGuide Founder and Publisher Dr. Ted Baehr, who used to be an attorney in the U.S. Attorney's of the district of New York, also supports VidAngel.

"Something is not a law until a court decides that it's legal or illegal," he told The Christian Post during an interview on Monday.

In VidAngel's case Baehr said, "If you or I buy a DVD we can do anything we want with it because it's ours."

Baehr likened VidAngel's case to his days in law school when there had been a dispute over the airspace between a PanAm building in New York City that had been constructed over Grand Central Station.

"So we were trying to figure out what value was a piece of an apartment hanging in mid-air, full of nothing, over the Grand Central Station … Now [regarding VidAngel] you're not just talking about a space in the air … you're now talking about a space — in a space — in a space — in somebody's electronic thought box. It would make 'The Matrix' look like a simple equation."

Baehr's bottom line on VidAngel: "I think from the act, and from the intention, and from the classic point of view, that once you buy something, you can feed it through your shredder, you can do anything you want with it … "

Baehr, however, is not in total agreement with the services VidAngel offers. "I don't think just whitewashing something or just erasing the foul language is a solution … There's a point in which VidAngel's work is solutary and beneficial for families. I think it's like seventy or eighty percent beneficial … "

"The court will make the law when it decides on this case."

Recently, the plaintiffs in the case against VidAngel asked a federal judge to force the video streaming company to shut down its operations while the suit is pending, and has requested a jury trial. VidAngel has filed a countersuit to prove that it is in fact not pirating copyrighted material.

VidAngel may have been blindsided by the lawsuit, as suggested in a recent statement from the company's CEO, Neal Harmon, which stated:

"We wish they (Disney and plaintiffs) would have let us know they had issue with VidAngel back in July 2015 when we wrote them a letter to inform them about VidAngel's lawful service."

Apparently that did not occur.

Harmon explained, however, that VidAngel has hired "Great Hollywood attorneys," and that it is armed for a courtroom battle, saying, "We're ready."

The Christian Post obtained this joint statement from Disney, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Bros. from Paul McGuire of Warner Bros. Corporate Communications regarding the services of VidAngel:

"VidAngel continues to invoke the Family Movie Act (FMA) to distract from its unauthorized activities. Plaintiffs are not challenging the FMA; rather, they are challenging VidAngel's unlicensed streaming service. As stated in the complaint: 'Nothing in the FMA gives VidAngel the right to copy or publicly perform' Plaintiffs' copyrighted movies and television shows without authorization. 'Nor does the FMA give VidAngel the right to circumvent the technological protection measures on DVDs and Blu-ray discs.' Plaintiffs believe that VidAngel's antitrust counterclaims are without merit and have filed a motion to dismiss them."

Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/vidangel-disney-ptc-movieguide-family-friendly-streaming-site-lawful-lucasfilms-warner-brothers-169848/#yuVwllsyBHHtRrP1.99

VidAngel, a company that enables the filtering of adult content from TV and movies, is facing a lawsuit from some of the biggest names in film: the Walt Disney Company, Lucasfilms, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Bros. The four industry giants claim that the video streaming service is infringing on its copyrighted material.

According to the lawsuit, Disney and the plaintiffs are suing for copyright infringement and for violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The plaintiffs also contend that the Utah-based movie filtering service does not have authorization to use its films and has failed to pay for the licensing of titles.

The irony is that VidAngel, a company intending to help families filter unwanted content, is being sued by Disney, a film and TV entity known to produce some of the more family-friendly material.

Several highly-regarded TV and film watchdogs are chiming in on the issue.

Asked if he thought VidAngel was pirating content, Parents Television Council (PTC) President Tim Winter was clear about his convictions, telling The Christian Post during an interview on Monday:

"The answer is, 'No.' They (VidAngel) are doing it (streaming content) lawfully. They are doing it properly," he said.

"What they're doing is they're actually buying physical copies of the DVDs, and then as a subscriber, you then purchase from them that DVD copy, and then you have the right to stream it because you own it, you bought it, and then what you are able to do is that you are able to sell it back to VidAngel for part of the purchase price."

Winter told CP that VidAngel's initial point of sale is key. "So it's a very important distinction that the VidAngel procedure is including. It's not just they're taking some movie and streaming it for profit without giving Disney any money. They're actually paying Disney for a copy of the DVD."

The PTC president said Disney's current business structure forces VidAngel to take the risk of paying for thousands of DVDs, not knowing if customers will make a purchase.

Winter added that reselling DVDs was also a big risk. "VidAngel has to buy a bunch of copies and hope that they've estimated correctly about how many that are not going to be reselling."

MovieGuide Founder and Publisher Dr. Ted Baehr, who used to be an attorney in the U.S. Attorney's of the district of New York, also supports VidAngel.

"Something is not a law until a court decides that it's legal or illegal," he told The Christian Post during an interview on Monday.

In VidAngel's case Baehr said, "If you or I buy a DVD we can do anything we want with it because it's ours."

Baehr likened VidAngel's case to his days in law school when there had been a dispute over the airspace between a PanAm building in New York City that had been constructed over Grand Central Station.

"So we were trying to figure out what value was a piece of an apartment hanging in mid-air, full of nothing, over the Grand Central Station … Now [regarding VidAngel] you're not just talking about a space in the air … you're now talking about a space — in a space — in a space — in somebody's electronic thought box. It would make 'The Matrix' look like a simple equation."

Baehr's bottom line on VidAngel: "I think from the act, and from the intention, and from the classic point of view, that once you buy something, you can feed it through your shredder, you can do anything you want with it … "

Baehr, however, is not in total agreement with the services VidAngel offers. "I don't think just whitewashing something or just erasing the foul language is a solution … There's a point in which VidAngel's work is solutary and beneficial for families. I think it's like seventy or eighty percent beneficial … "

"The court will make the law when it decides on this case."

Recently, the plaintiffs in the case against VidAngel asked a federal judge to force the video streaming company to shut down its operations while the suit is pending, and has requested a jury trial. VidAngel has filed a countersuit to prove that it is in fact not pirating copyrighted material.

VidAngel may have been blindsided by the lawsuit, as suggested in a recent statement from the company's CEO, Neal Harmon, which stated:

"We wish they (Disney and plaintiffs) would have let us know they had issue with VidAngel back in July 2015 when we wrote them a letter to inform them about VidAngel's lawful service."

Apparently that did not occur.

Harmon explained, however, that VidAngel has hired "Great Hollywood attorneys," and that it is armed for a courtroom battle, saying, "We're ready."

The Christian Post obtained this joint statement from Disney, 20th Century Fox, and Warner Bros. from Paul McGuire of Warner Bros. Corporate Communications regarding the services of VidAngel:

"VidAngel continues to invoke the Family Movie Act (FMA) to distract from its unauthorized activities. Plaintiffs are not challenging the FMA; rather, they are challenging VidAngel's unlicensed streaming service. As stated in the complaint: 'Nothing in the FMA gives VidAngel the right to copy or publicly perform' Plaintiffs' copyrighted movies and television shows without authorization. 'Nor does the FMA give VidAngel the right to circumvent the technological protection measures on DVDs and Blu-ray discs.' Plaintiffs believe that VidAngel's antitrust counterclaims are without merit and have filed a motion to dismiss them."

MEET THE TEEN WHO STOPPED HIS TEACHER FROM DEFILING OLD GLORY

by TODD STARNES

Student Alex Dunn (Courtesy)

Alex Dunn is Captain America.

The 16-year-old junior at Massey Hill Classical High School in Fayetteville, North Carolina, is a red, white and blue patriot who loves America.

And he especially loves the American flag.

"I have a father in the military who taught me the way to respect the flag," Alex told me.

When he saw that his teacher was desecrating the flag during a classroom discussion on Monday, the teenager knew he had to do something. And what he did has patriots across the fruited plain cheering.

History teacher Lee Francis admitted to me on Tuesday that he desecrated the flag during a lesson on the First Amendment.

First, he asked students for a lighter. Then, he picked up a pair of scissors on his desk and tried to cut the flag. When that did not work, he tossed it on the ground and stomped on Old Glory.

"It was such a disgraceful thing for a person to do—especially in front of so many military children who understand the meaning of the flag—apparently unlike him," he said.

Alex was stunned.

"I didn't want to believe that it was really happening," he said. "But when he stepped on the flag—I just thought about all these men and women who fought for that flag that he just walked on, all these men and women who've come home with that flag draped over their coffin."

So Alex grabbed his phone and snapped a photo—a photo that would eventually go viral on Facebook. Then, the teenager rose from his seat, picked up the flag and took the defiled banner to the principal's office.

"We are extremely proud of him," Alex's mother told me. "He did the right thing."

However, doing the right thing could land the brave, young patriot in hot water.
advertisement

Mr. Francis told me Alex "broke the law" and should be punished.

"I believe that child does need to be punished in some way—absolutely," the teacher told me. "I can't take a picture of them and in turn they cannot do the same of me."

I called the Cumberland County District Attorney's office as well as the local superintendent to find out if any laws or rules had been broken. Neither agency returned my calls.

"If it's within Mr. Francis' rights to stomp on it, cut it and try to burn it, then it is within my child's rights to defend that flag," Mrs. Dunn said.

Sadly, many of the teenager's classmates are siding with the teacher.

"There was much more support for what he did than what I did," Alex said, noting that some students even protested by refusing to stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

The question really isn't about desecrating the flag; the school teacher certainly has the right to demonstrate his hatred of America.

"But was it appropriate in a classroom in front of children—in front of military children? No, it was not," Mrs. Dunn told me. "It wasn't the appropriate place to defile an American flag.

I sincerely doubt the school district or the district attorney will punish Alex Dunn.

But should that happen, I would be more than willing to stand up and serve the punishment in his place. And I'd wager there are plenty of American patriots across this great nation who would be willing to do the same.

Thank you, Alex Dunn for reminding us that America is still the land of the free and the home of the brave.

PRECIOUS CHILD GOES VIRAL IN PATRIOTIC PHOTO

by JESSILYN JUSTICE

Royce Thompson stops to pray after the Pledge of Allegiance. (Helen Nelson/Facebook)

Sneakers fly and backpacks shuffle when most kids are running late to school. But not for kindergartner Royce Thompson.

The precious child stopped dead in his tracks when he heard his fellow classmates recite the Pledge of Allegiance to start their day.

When his mother drove by, she captured the photo of Royce standing with his head bowed and hand over heart.

But that's not all.

Mom Helen Nelson posted to Facebook:
I had dropped Royce off in the line..by the time I drove up he was doing this.. I couldn't really tell what he was doing and I was saying "Royce..go..go" as kids walked around him. Well he didn't budge and I thought what is this child doing? The officer said "mom he's doing good, he stopped for the Pledge of Allegiance ( and then she puts her hand over her heart to show me) and now he's praying". Since they do not have prayer in schools he says a little prayer silently and that's exactly what he was doing. I was so proud that he stopped when the Pledge of Allegiance came and stood his ground and did not move as the other kids were going in and then took time out and prayed and did not even care or think twice about it. This is such a beautiful picture.

Everyone all together now: "Aw!"

DONALD TRUMP: "NOW....LET US TURN AGAIN TO OUR CHRISTIAN HERITAGE TO LIFT UP THE SOUL OF OUR NATION"

by BOB ESCHLIMAN

As an old proverb on foreign policy goes, "Only Nixon could go to China." But, after his meeting with an African-American evangelical congregation on Saturday, someday, they might make a similar statement about race relations:

"Only Trump could go to Detroit."


Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump absolutely stunned the political world with a speech that went directly to the heart of his efforts to reach out to African-American voters. And afterward, a number of African-American faith leaders said they were swayed by his comments.

"For centuries, the African-American church has been the conscience of our country," he said. "It's from the pews and pulpits and Christian teachings of black churches all across this land that the Civil Rights movement lifted up its soul and lifted up the soul of our nation. It's from these pews that our nation has been inspired toward a better moral character, a deeper concern for mankind, and spirit of charity and unity that binds us all together.

"And we're bound together and I see that today. This has been an amazing day for me.

"The African-American faith community has been one of God's greatest gifts to America and to its people. There is perhaps no action our leaders can take that would do more to heal our country and support our people than to provide a greater platform to the Black churches and church-goers.

"You do right everyday by your community and your families. You raise children in the Light of God; I will always support your church, always. And defend your right to worship ...

"I am here today to listen to your message and I hope that my presence here will also help your voice to reach new audiences in our country and many of these audiences desperately need your spirit and your thought. I can tell you that.

"Christian faith is not the past but the present and the future. Make it stronger. And we'll open it up to great, great leaders."

Trump repeated his earlier talking points on the economy, job creation, taxes, education, and immigration. He also discussed community policing and national security. But he quickly came back to his message for African-American voters.

"Our nation is too divided," he said. "We talk past each other, not to each other and those who seek office do not do enough to step into the community and learn what is going on. They don't know. They have no clue.

"I'm here today to learn. So that we can together remedy injustice, in any form. And so that we can also remedy economics so that the African-American community can benefit economically through jobs and income and so many other different ways.

"Our political system has failed the people and works only to enrich itself. I want to reform that system so that it works for you, everyone in this room. I believe true reform can only come from outside the system.

"Being a businessman is much different than being a politician because I understand what is happening. And we are going outside the establishment.

"Becoming the nominee of the Party of Abraham Lincoln—a lot of people don't realize that Abraham Lincoln, the great Abraham Lincoln was a Republican—has been the greatest honor of my life. It is on his legacy that I hope to build the future of the Party but more important the future of the country and the community."

He continued that "nothing is more sad" than when young African-Americans with "tremendous potential" are sidelined. He noted he had met with a group of young African-American men earlier in the day and was touched by their desire to find jobs.

"Our whole country loses out when we're unable to harness the brilliance and the energy of these folks," he said. "We're one nation and when anyone hurts, we all hurt together. That is so true. So true. We're all brothers and sisters and we're all created by the same God. We must love each other and support each other and we are in this all together. All together.

"I fully understand that the African-American community has suffered from discrimination and that there are many wrongs that must still be made right and they will be right. I want America prosperous for everyone. I want to make this city the economic envy of the world and we can do that. We can do that again."

But it was Trump's closing statements that really impressed those who heard him speak. It was a side of Donald Trump very few have seen on the campaign trail, but those who were on hand said it was a very "genuine moment" for the GOP presidential nominee.

"Now, in these hard times for our country, let us turn again to our Christian heritage to lift up the soul of our nation," he said. "I am so deeply grateful to be here today and it is my prayer that the America of tomorrow—and I mean that—that the America of tomorrow will be one of unity, togetherness, and peace.

"And perhaps we can add the word prosperity. OK? Prosperity.

"I'd like to conclude with a passage from 1 John, Chapter 4. You know it? See, most groups I speak to don't know that. But we know it. If you want, we can say it together: 'No one has ever seen God, but if we love one another, God lives in us and His love is made complete in us.'"