ATLANTA STREET PREACHER BANNED FROM SHARING THE GOSPEL TAKES CASE TO COURT

by Alegra Hall

One Atlanta street preacher is taking Georgia authorities to court over efforts to keep him from sharing the Gospel on public sidewalks.  

Evangelist Eric Love says he was banned from preaching about redemption through Jesus Christ while standing outside the Shady Beats concert last May.  

Love claims the Georgia World Congress Center Authority violated his civil rights by denying him the freedom to speak on a public thoroughfare where thousands were gathered for the festival. 

According to attorney Tony Mangini of the Center for Religious Expression, Mr. Love should be allowed to speak on the public sidewalks like everyone else.  

Mangini, who is the attorney for Love, says this case is definitely important because it calls into question rights of free speech and religious liberty.

"Many Christians take the Great Commission seriously, and feel obliged to spread the Gospel publicly," he said.  "For Christians, communicating about your faith is one of, if not the primary method for putting your faith into practice.  Because of this, opponents of religion, and Christianity particularly, target free expression.  If they can silence religious expression, they can effectively render religion impotent and irrelevant."

In the past year, there have been numerous cases of business owners fighting to survive for following their conscience on issues like Biblical marriage, or school children who are forced to stop reading the Bible or coaches who are fired for praying with athletes.

Mangini says he sees the hostility growing against the faith. 

"Christians are facing unprecedented hostility to publicly share their faith.  If cities are not shutting down speakers simply because someone else dislikes what they have to say, they are banning expressive activity outright, like the Authority here.  And in schools, students are indoctrinated with secular dogma and being refused equal treatment when they try to form a Bible club."

Though the tensions may be mounting, Mangini reminds Christians they must not be silent and they should know the law.

"People of faith can protect themselves against this assault by knowing their rights and exercising them.  The government cannot shut down speech in a truly public place, like a public park or sidewalk, just because the government or a private citizen doesn't like it.  Nor can the government ban every form of expression in such places.  If a situation arises, they can always contact us."

Meanwhile, Love is hoping the courts decide in his favor soon because he plans to be outside preaching again at the SweetWater 420 Festival next April.  

The event brings thousands to Centennial Park for a mix of live music, food, and comedy.   

For Love, that's a chance to preach God's love to thousands of souls longing for Jesus.


7 THINGS PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS DONE FOR CHRISTIANS IN 2017

President Donald Trump bows his head during a prayer as he holds a Cabinet Meeting in the Cabinet Room at the White House in Washington, DC, December 20, 2017
Yes, our faith is in Christ. Our hope doesn’t depend on who’s in the White House. We elect a president not a pastor. And yes, some days this President is more profane than pious.

Still, the person in the Oval Office can change the lives of Christians here and around the world. This particular President has proven to be a friend of the faithful. Here are 7 ways:

7: He Got Sworn In
It’s no small thing that it was Donald Trump rather than Hillary Clinton taking the oath of office January 20 … no matter how many or how few people were in the crowd. While there are plenty of reasons to be grateful Hillary is plugging a book and not making policy perhaps chief among them is her hostility to views held sacred by traditional believers.

Abortion? Planned Parenthood could have set up a clinic in the Rose Garden. Gender Indentity? The “Let Men Pretend to Be Girls to Get in Locker Rooms and If You Don’t Like It Suck It Movement” would have full backing of the DOJ. Religious Liberty? Bakers and florists marked only the start.

Hillary was fond of saying “freedom of worship,” rather than “freedom of religion.” You don’t change the wording of the Constitution unless there’s a reason. “Freedom of religion” means you are free to act out your faith in the public square without government infringing. “Freedom of worship” suggests you are free to believe what you want within your house of worship — but your freedom stops when you walk out the church door.

Hillary wasn’t even willing to stop there. Her campaign plotted a revolution from inside the Catholic church. 

And she made no secret about wanting to force churches to accept abortion rights and same-sex marriage rights. “Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” she said in 2015. “Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will. And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs, and structural biases have to be changed.”

So all told, it is a big deal Donald Trump put his hand on the Bible last January. Hillary Clinton was set to boot it onto Pennsylvania Avenue.

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY

6. He Got Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court
During the election, an argument was made to conservative evangelicals queasy about Mr. Access Hollywood that voting for Trump meant voting for conservative, faith-friendly Supreme Court justices. Trump would be in office for at most eight years. Those justices would last a generation. That argument had particular urgency with the seat of Justice Scalia still open.

Trump won and true to his word, he put a conservative judge on the High Court. In fact, it happened to be the judge that ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby in its fight to avoid being forced to pay for abortive contraception. While it’s too early to see exactly how Justice Gorsuch’s presence will affect the court when it rules on matters of faith, this term has already shown a Supreme Court willing to slap down lower court decisions based on political bias rather than the law or liberty.

Meanwhile, Trump has been stocking the bench with similar conservative justices.

5. He Signed the Religious Liberty Decree and Fought the Johnson Amendment
President Trump made the defense of religious liberty and efforts to repeal the Johnson Amendment an early priority.

On the National Day of Prayer in May, he signed a religious liberty executive order allowing religious organizations greater freedom in political speech. The “Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty” order also gave “regulatory relief” to companies that object to the Obamacare contraception mandate.

“We will not allow people of faith to be targeted, bullied or silenced anymore,” he said. “We are giving our churches their voices back.”

Trump had vowed at the National Prayer Breakfast to “totally destroy” the Johnson Amendment. This law has been used to block religious institutions and all nonprofit entities organized as 501(c)3s to endorse political candidates. It has many a pastor and priest hesitant to speak up on political issues.

A repeal of the Johnson Amendment was in the House version of the tax reform bill. However, Democrats managed to get the repeal removed from the final version of the bill. (Though why they’d be happy about keeping faith leaders from their First Amendment rights is beyond me.)

However, even if the fight goes on, Trump gets props for raising the issue and engaging in the fight.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

4. He Fought For Life
For Christians concerned about protecting the unborn, President Trump offered several hopeful signs that he’s fighting for a culture of life.

The first sign was the few hundred thousand abortion rights supporters in their kitty hats screaming their heads off in his backyard before he’d even unpacked. They know who their enemy is.
He’s gone after Planned Parenthood. In April, Trump signed a law taking aim at the abortion giant’s federal funding. Earlier this month, DOJ revealed it had launched a federal investigation into Planned Parenthood’s practices and the sale of fetal tissue.

He went to court to stop pregnant teenage illegal immigrants in U.S. custody from having abortions. He hasn’t won any of the fights yet. Thus far, two girls that we know were able to get abortions, thanks to the efforts of the ACLU and willing judges. But pro-life believers can take heart that Trump fought for life over death.

Finally, a three word change to an obscure HHS document may be the biggest and boldest move of the year for Trump. His administration is defining life as “beginning at conception.” The monumental act is tucked in the draft of an HHS strategic plan from March. “HHS accomplishes its mission through programs and initiatives that cover a wide spectrum of activities, serving and protecting Americans at every stage of life, beginning at conception.”  The Trump administration added the phrase “beginning at conception.”

If the U.S. government says life begins at conception and its job is “serving and protecting Americans at every stage of life” then it has a duty to protect the unborn by any legal means necessary.


3. He Wiped Up on ISIS
President Trump’s smackdown of ISIS in Syria and Iraq (and elsewhere) is more than just a military victory. It has brought relief to Christians in both countries from Islamic State’s genocide and terror.

The proof is in the holiday pudding. For the first time in three years, Christian were able to celebrate Christmas in the regions of Iraq and Syria formerly under ISIS control.

In a related vein, he’s reversed the Obama policy which seemed to work overtime to keep Christian refugees fleeing slaughter from coming to the United States. According to a Pew Research Center analysis, within the first few months of his administration, more Christian than Muslim refugees were admitted.

2. He Listens
This one strikes very close to home. Stream founder James Robison is on the President’s so-called “faith council.” This is a group of faith leaders who meet and talk collectively and privately with the President. They offer counsel, support, and yes, a good talking to when necessary.

For lack of guidance a nation falls, but victory is won through many advisers” (Proverbs 11:14)

During the campaign pundits said Trump was just using the evangelical leaders to land the evangelical vote. Even some of the leaders suspected that once Trump was elected they’d be dispatched as quickly as Obama tossed Oprah out of the loop in 2009. Swept away like confetti. However, that has not been the case. Trump doesn’t just give photo ops to these people. He listens.

faith and prayer in the oval officeTwitter/@JohnnieM

In fact, go back to the campaign. James publicly stated he was no fan of Trump’s. He was friends with virtually every other candidate, knew them to be solid Christians. In fact, a couple of the nominees are like sons to James. And when those “sons,” Gov. Huckabee and Ben Carson, announced their support for Trump, it was if they had taken their inheritance and spent it on wild living. Yet both told James the same thing: “You’re not going to believe it, but this guy listens. He listens.”

Carson’s endorsement of Trump was contingent on Trump meeting for an hour with James. With a bit of a grumble, Trump agreed. Also with a bit of grumble, but never one to pass up an opportunity to preach Christ to anyone, James agreed. James came back with the same assessment that has only grown over time: Trump listens. He is eager to hear the Word. The president wants to have Godly wisdom around him. He is humble and grateful for prayers.

What’s this mean? It means, though some days it seems far from obvious, he is listening to Godly wisdom.


1. He and His Administration Openly Pray and Praise
No one is going to mistake Donald Trump for Billy Graham. Rev. Robison suggests Trump is more like the rough and tumble Peter who preached at Pentecost weeks after loping off a soldier’s ear with his sword. A work in progress, we might say.

Yet, Trump’s words have gone beyond his enthusiasm for saying “Merry Christmas” or his stock line about Americans believing in God not government. Throughout the year, Trump has shown an openness to speak of God and his rightful role in shaping our nation. On behalf of all Americans he has called on God to bring healing to those hurt in our storms. He has spoken of the need to love one another.

At the year’s final cabinet meeting he asked Carson to lead a prayer. He prayed with his cabinet at Camp David in the days of Hurricane Harvey and Irma. Vice President Pence says he and the President pray together before major decisions.

Policy decisions are one thing. But what does it mean to have the Leader of the Free World and his cabinet pray and be humble?

Psalms tells us “Blessed is the nation whose God is the LORD” (Psalm 33:12)

So do not fear, for I am with you;

do not be dismayed, for I am your God.

I will strengthen you and help you;

I will uphold you with my righteous right hand. (Isaiah 41:10)


GIVE US WISDOM: BEN CARSON LEADS TRUMP CABINET IN PRAYER BEFORE TAX REFORM VOTE

by CBN News

 President Donald Trump asked Dr. Ben Carson to lead his Cabinet and the nation in a prayer for unity and wisdom Wednesday ahead of the House's final vote to pass the tax reform bill.

Cameras flickered as President Trump and his advisers bowed their heads in prayer.

"Our kind Father in heaven, we're so thankful for the opportunity and the freedom that you've granted us. We thank you for a president and cabinet members who are courageous and willing to face the winds of controversy in order to provide a better future for those who come behind them. We're thankful for the unity in Congress that's presented the opportunity for our economy to expand so that we can fight he corrosive debt that's been destroying our future. And we hope that that unity will spread beyond party lines so that people will realize that we have a nation that is worth saving, and recognize that nations divided against themselves will not stand. In this time of discord, distrust, and dishonesty, we ask that you will give us a spirit of gratitude, compassion, and common sense. Give us the wisdom to be able to guide this great nation and the future. We ask in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit," Carson prayed.

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY


The public prayer comes at a time when President Donald Trump is celebrating the success of the GOP tax bill, claiming it fulfills his long-held campaign promise to repeal Obamacare.


"We had a historic victory for the American people," Trump said during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday. “Obamacare has been repealed in this bill."

The bill repeals the individual mandate found in Obamacare, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance and penalizes those who do not.

President Trump also promised more money in the hands of working Americans in the Middle class.

"The heart of our bill is a tremendous amount of relief for the Middle Class including a doubling of the child tax credit and a nearly doubling of the standard deduction," he said.

The bill initially passed both chambers, but the House had to vote again because its original version contained provisions that violated Senate budget rules. Despite the delay, President Trump says the bill will be signed before Christmas.


RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN 2018: WHAT TO WATCH

By NANCY FLORY 

From veterans’ memorials to coaches’ efforts to pray, 2017 saw many legal cases involving religious freedom. The Stream recently spoke with Jeremy Dys, Deputy General Counsel for First Liberty, about cases to watch in 2018. First Liberty is a legal organization dedicated to protecting First Amendment rights for all Americans.

Here are some cases which Dys said we can expect to see moving forward in 2018:

Bladensburg, Maryland
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ordered the removal of a 90-year-old veterans memorial cross. The World War I veterans memorial has been in place since 1925. It honors 49 Bladensburg-area men who died in that conflict. First Liberty and Jones Day together filed a petition on November 1, 2017, for rehearing en banc on behalf of The American Legion. The case is currently pending.
EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY

Coach Joe Kennedy
Washington State high school assistant football coach Joe Kennedy got suspended in October 2015 for praying silently after a game. Ultimately, Kennedy lost his job. First Liberty filed a lawsuit against Kennedy’s school district in August, 2016. On August 23, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit held that Kennedy’s prayers deserved no protection by the Constitution. Mike Berry, Deputy General Counsel at First Liberty, said First Liberty was “deeply disappointed.” “According to the Ninth Circuit, a school district can fire a coach for making the sign of the cross or bowing his head in prayer when a player gets hurt.” Berry added that First Liberty will continue to explore all options while reviewing the case.

Orthodox Jews & Kaporos
For millennia, Orthodox Jews have participated in kaporos. That’s an atonement ritual involving the humane and kosher killing of a chicken. The practice draws attacks by animal activists. The latest came in September 2017. Critics filed a lawsuit “seeking to force the cities of Los Angeles and Irvine to use police force to prevent Orthodox Jews” from practicing kaporos. Activists also threatened to place kaporos participants under citizens’ arrest. This case is pending.

Mary Anne Sause
Police came to Mary Anne Sause’s home in 2013 in response to an “alleged minor noise complaint.” She began to pray in her own home. The police ordered her to stop. They threatened her with jail if she did not. In June, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled in the police officer’s favor. However, they admitted that the police officers had violated Sause’s First Amendment rights. First Liberty, along with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP asked the court to reverse the decision through a petition for certiorari in a filing to the U.S. Supreme Court. This case is pending.


Upcoming Legislation
Dys said to keep an eye on the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA) and the possible Johnson Amendment repeal.

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

FADA, or H.R. 2802, “Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that: (1) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or (2) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” It was introduced in the House June 17, 2015. It would impact cases like the one involving a baker who declined to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

The Johnson Amendment arose in the early 1950s. It regulates how tax-exempt organizations (including pastors) may talk about politics. The Johnson Amendment figures in the current tax bill and might face repeal.


What Next?
Ben Bull joins First Liberty as its new Executive Director of Advocacy. A “recognized expert in Constitutional law,” Bull has litigated hundreds of cases. Bull has previously served as General Counsel of American Family Association and Executive Director of the American Center for Law and Justice’s (ACLJ) international office, the European Center for Law and Justice. He built Alliance Defending Freedom’s (ADF) litigation and advocacy component and supervised numerous offices across the globe.

In an interview with The Stream, Bull said that we can expect to see more attacks on religious freedom. “There’s a war being raged right now by the ACLU and their friends against anything religious, period. … They want religious believers to be barricaded inside their religious places of worship. Even then, they’ll continue a frontal assault because they’ll want to dictate the kinds of sermons the pastor can say by censoring political speech … and by requiring pastors and churches and synagogues to perform same sex wedding ceremonies and so on. There’ll be no stopping point.”


CHRISTIANITY AND THE MESSAGE OF "STAR WARS"

by J. LEE GRADY

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away (well, actually it was 40 years ago in a crowded theater in suburban Atlanta) I saw Star Wars. It was 1977. I was a 19-year-old college student. I was totally wowed.

The special effects mesmerized me. I loved the light sabers, the droids and Luke Skywalker's speeder bike. I laughed when Princess Leia said of Chewbacca, "Will someone get this big walking carpet out of my way?" I cheered when the good guys blew up the Death Star, and when the evil villain Darth Vader spun out of control in his TIE fighter into the depths of space—promising a sequel.

And there have been plenty of sequels and prequels since that first episode. Altogether the Star Wars movies have made $37 billion. The film franchise's creator, George Lucas, sold the rights to the movies to Disney in 2012 for $4 billion. And now Disney expects to make $425 million in one weekend when the next installment, The Last Jedi, opens tomorrow.

When the first movie came out, some Christians immediately condemned it, claiming that George Lucas was a closet Hindu and that the movie was a satanic conspiracy aimed at planting New Age ideas into children's minds. Those same critics got louder after the release of the second film, The Empire Strikes Back, mainly because the green, cartoonish Yoda (sounds too much like "yoga") was a Krishna-esque guru who taught his padawan disciple, Luke, how to levitate objects with his thoughts.

But within a few years observers started noticing that Star Wars contained basic Christian themes such as the triumph of good over evil, the virtue of sacrifice and the power of redemption. That bad-to-good redemption angle was especially obvious in The Return of the Jedi, when Darth Vader turns against the devilish emperor to defend Luke, who refuses to convert to the dark side of the mysterious Force.

Many Christian authors have found faith inspiration in the Star Wars stories. They have produced books including The Gospel According to Star Wars (John C. McDowell), Star Wars Jesus (Caleb Grimes) and Finding God in a Galaxy Far, Far Away (Timothy Paul Jones). Writer Paul Kent even wrote a 40-day devotional, The Real Force, based on the movies.

But the question remains: Are the Star Wars movies good for us? Or are they dangerous? Or are they just harmless, escapist entertainment?

Maybe you won't trust me to answer that, since I plan to see The Last Jedi. I'm not one of those Christians who demonizes a film just because it isn't appropriate for Sunday school. I didn't shield my children from fairy tales, even if those stories contained magic ("Cinderella," "Pinocchio"), a witch (The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe) or a ghost (A Christmas Carol). In fact, I believe God can use creative fiction to teach and inspire us.

I like good stories. I especially love stories in which the underdog becomes a hero and fights for justice. I love stories in which the good guys win, the bad guys lose and the worst guy realizes he made a mistake and decides to change. I love stories that illustrate the values I want in my life, even if the setting is a fictional planet (like Alderaan or Tatooine) or a fictional town in Alabama (like Maycomb in my favorite novel, To Kill a Mockingbird).

That is the appeal of all the Star Wars movies. They speak to us on a deep level about important themes like forgiveness, courage and virtue. They emphasize faith, hope and love.

Just because I like the Star Wars films doesn't mean I think they have correct theology. I don't believe the Force is the same thing as the God of the Bible (and yes, there are definite Hindu and Buddhist ideas thrown into the mix). But I do believe I can use the Star Wars story to help a person understand Christianity. That is the job of a wise evangelist—he can use a cultural reference, a myth, a pop song or a film to preach the gospel.


If the apostle Paul were around today, I suspect he would be at the Cineplex watching Star Wars—and collecting material for his next sermon. He tried to be relevant to his audience. He said, "I have become all things to all men, that I might by all means save some" (1 Cor. 9:22). He spoke the language of his culture without ever watering down his message or his morals.

Paul often used the popular poetry of his day to reach unbelievers. When he preached in Athens, he quoted two secular poets to describe God's vast purpose in a way that made sense to a pagan audience. He was quoting Epimenides when he said: "For in Him [God] we live and move and exist" (see Acts 17:28).

Our culture today is very much like first-century Athens. For many people, The Last Jedi is the closest thing they have to religion. Let's be sensitive to those who are seeking the meaning of life even when they go to a movie. Start conversations. Share how Jesus has been the true "Force" in your life. Let the Holy Spirit use you to turn many people from the dark side.


ATTEMPTED TERROR ATTACK PIPE BOMB STRAPPED TO MAN EXPLODES IN NYC SUBWAY

By COLLEEN LONG 

Four people, including the suspect, were injured.

Police secure Eighth Avenue outside the Port Authority Bus Terminal following an explosion near New York's Times Square on Monday, Dec. 11, 2017. Police said a man with a pipe bomb strapped to him set off the crude device in an underground passageway under 42nd Street between Seventh and Eighth Avenues.
A man inspired by Islamic State extremists strapped on a crude pipe bomb, slipped unnoticed into the nation’s busiest subway system and set the device off at rush hour Monday in a scenario that New York has dreaded for years, authorities said.

In the end, the only serious wounds were to the suspect himself, Akayed Ullah, a 27-year-old Bangladeshi immigrant and former cab driver, authorities said. But the attack sent terrified commuters fleeing through a smoky passageway, and three people suffered headaches and ringing ears from the first bomb blast in the subway in more than two decades.

“This was an attempted terrorist attack,” Democratic Mayor Bill de Blasio told reporters. “Thank God the perpetrator did not achieve his ultimate goals.”

The attack near Times Square came less than two months after eight people died near the World Trade Center in a truck attack authorities said was also inspired by the Islamic State group.

Law enforcement officials said Ullah was inspired by ISIS but apparently did not have any direct contact with the group and probably acted alone. Gov. Andrew Cuomo said there was no evidence, so far, of other bombs or a larger plot. He said officials were exploring whether Ullah had been on authorities’ radar, but there was no indication yet that he was.


Investigators described the bomb as a low-tech explosive device attached to Ullah with Velcro and plastic ties. They were looking into how it was made. Cuomo said there was reason to believe the attacker looked at bomb-making instructions online.

Authorities were searching Ullah’s Brooklyn home and a rented space in a building nearby, interviewing witnesses and relatives, reviewing his subway fare card and looking for surveillance footage that might show his movements in the moments before the 7:20 a.m. attack.

Security cameras did capture the attacker walking casually through a crowded passageway under 42nd Street between Seventh and Eighth avenues when the bomb went off amid a plume of white smoke, which cleared to show the man sprawled on the ground and commuters scattering.

“All we could hear was the chaos,” said Elrana Peralta, a Greyhound customer-service worker who was working at the Port Authority bus terminal near the blast, though she did not hear it. Instead, she heard people yelling, “Get out! Get out! Get out!”

Port Authority police said officers found the man injured on the ground, with wires protruding from his jacket to his pants and the device strapped to his torso under his coat. They said he was reaching for a cellphone and they grabbed his hands.

A photo published by the New York Post showed a bearded man crumpled on the ground with his shirt apparently blown off and black soot covering his bare midriff.

Investigators said it was not clear if he set the bomb off intentionally or prematurely.

Law enforcement officials said the suspect was speaking with investigators from the hospital bed where he was being treated for burns to his hands and abdomen. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the blast.

Ullah came to the U.S. from Bangladesh in 2011 on an F-4 visa, a preferential visa available for those with family in the U.S. who are citizens, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security said.

He had been licensed to drive a livery cab between 2012 and 2015, but the license was allowed to lapse, according to law enforcement officials and NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission.

White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the explosion showed the need for immigration reform, including ending what’s known as “chain migration” within families. Republican President Donald Trump’s administration has called for a “merit-based” immigration system that would limit family-based green cards to spouses and minor children.

“If that had been in place, that would have prevented this individual from coming to the United States,” Sanders said.

Ullah lived with his father, mother and brother in a Brooklyn neighborhood with a large Bangladeshi community, residents said. The family’s red, two-story brick home is just off a shopping strip.

News of his arrest stunned Alan Butrico, who owns the house next door and a locksmith business two doors down.

“It’s very weird,” Butrico said. “You never know who your neighbors are.”

The last bomb to go off in the subway system was believed to be in December 1994, when an explosive made from mayonnaise jars and batteries wounded 48 people in a car in lower Manhattan.

The Times Square subway station is the city’s busiest, with 64 million riders passing through every year. The subway system as a whole carried over 1.7 billion people last year.

Monday’s explosion triggered a massive emergency response both above and below ground, halting what would ordinarily be a bustling rush hour at the “Crossroads of the World.” But streets quickly began returning to normal.

“This is one of my nightmares, right: a terrorist attack in the subway system,” Cuomo, a Democrat, later told cable channel NY1.

“The good news is: We were on top of it,” he said, and “the reality was not as bad as the fear.”



STUDENTS FOR LIFE AND FREE SPEECH" "THE ONLY PERMIT WE NEED IS THE FIRST AMENDMENT"

Ellen Wittman, President of Students for Life, Miami University Hamilton Campus; on December 7, 2017
It wasn’t an unusual request. Nothing like it had been denied before. The same student group had got it in previous years. This year, though, when Students for Life at Miami University’s Hamilton, Ohio, regional campus, applied to put up a pro-life display, the school told her no — not unless they also put up warning signs around campus.

On November 29, the Alliance Defending Freedom filed suit in federal court to support the group’s free speech rights on campus. On December 7 The Stream met with Students for Life local chapter president Ellen Whitman on campus to learn more. Her ADF attorney, Travis Barham, joined by phone.

Ellen Wittman comes across as bright, confident and well assured of herself and her position. She explained her strength as simply coming from knowing the Constitution is on her side.

Restricted Speech
The display was to be a field of 200 crosses on the main campus quad, a “Cemetery of the Innocents” representing lives lost to abortion. Campus officials told them they had to post a note around campus saying: “Students for Life is displaying its annual cross event. Please contact Ellen Whitman if you have questions.” That would “shut down our speech and made us send a message we didn’t want to send,” Wittman said.

“The Constitution is the only permit we need to speak on campus.”

“Ultimately,” she pointed out, “that would not only deter people from [the display]. It would also point out who was behind it. Really, the only permit we need to speak on campus is the First Amendment. We don’t need the university to even be involved that way.”


Selective Enforcement, Compelled Speech
Miami University has an existing policy by which they claim the right to make this requirement. It has never been implemented for any group before this one, however. Selective enforcement “is one of the many problems with these policies,” according to Barham.

He added, “The university officials were trying to compel Ellen and her friends to issue a government-mandated message. … The First Amendment is very clear that universities cannot compel speech, especially when that speech directly contradicts the purpose of the speaker. They cannot force a student to put up a warning-sign message — or any message — as a condition for allowing them to speak on campus.”

Reactions on Campus
Students for Life members were “upset,” said Wittman, “knowing we were being singled out and our rights violated.” There are some 200 members on the group’s roster, with about 20 of them regularly active in meetings and events.

“The best antidote to speech we don’t like is more speech, not less.”

Other students’ reactions on campus have been “pretty friendly.” The Stream asked whether it felt like a case of pressure against her Christian faith. “Ultimately it’s more of a constitutional thing for me than a faith thing. Because this case is about free speech, it’s not necessarily about whether it’s the pro-life issue or the abortion issue. It’s about free speech, which is one of your rights.”

A Nationwide Issue
Wittman sees this as another example of free speech being “clearly under attack on campuses nationwide. … I think it’s everywhere. It needs to be addressed. I’m glad we’re able to come out and take a stand for free speech and send that message not only to the campus community here at Miami but nationwide. Our rights are being violated and we need to do something about it.”

Help us champion truth, freedom, limited government and human dignity. Support The Stream »

“I think that awareness itself is going to strengthen the free speech movement,” she said. “A lot of students might not necessarily know that universities have these policies. They’re kind of tucked away, and only implemented when the administration sees fit. Exposition and awareness to the campus community is only going to help, because all speech should be allowed on campus, no matter the viewpoint.”

Barham added there is strength to be found under the protections of the law. He noted that Alliance Defending Freedom has been defending students’ free speech rights for years.

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY

“Offensive” Speech Is Constitutionally Protected
He also explained that some people thought the speech Ellen and her friends wanted to partake in “offensive.” 

“This case illustrates the absurd consequences of that approach,” he said. “When you have something as innocuous as a display of crosses, and when additional restrictions are put on it that aren’t placed on any other student speech on campus, it shows the absurd consequences.”

The Supreme Court has repeatedly protected speech considered “offensive,” he noted. “Out of a multitude of voices truth will arise. The best antidote to speech we don’t like is more speech, not less,” said Barham.

“What is deemed ‘hate speech’ these days is a very subjective term,” added Wittman. “You can’t really limit it without completely limiting the First Amendment.”

“One of the Cornerstones of Higher Education”
“I think that ultimately we’re hoping to get a change in policy so that all students on campus can speak freely.”

The suit was filed on November 29. What happens with it next is in the university’s court to decide. What happens then depends on whether the university soon recognizes the merits of the students’ position.

“It certainly feels very discriminatory,” Wittman said. “The Constitution is the only permit we need to speak on campus. So with the fact that our speech is being conditioned, and our rights are being violated, obviously I feel very personally affected. Obviously Students for Life is affected by it as well.

“I think that ultimately we’re hoping to get a change in policy so that all students on campus can speak freely. That’s what we want. Miami University needs to encourage free speech. It’s one of the cornerstones of higher education.”


BREAKING: US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE INVESTIGAGTING PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR SELLING BABY PARTS

by Claire Chretien

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is officially investigating Planned Parenthood for selling baby body parts, more than two years after the release of the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) videos.

“It is time for public officials to finally hold Planned Parenthood and their criminal abortion enterprise accountable under the law,” said David Daleiden of CMP.

Fox News broke the story Thursday evening, reporting that they had obtained a letter from Justice Department Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Stephen Boyd to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. This letter asked for unredacted documents from that committee, which had been investigating Planned Parenthood.

“This is long-awaited, good news,” said Abby Johnson, a former abortion advocate and Planned Parenthood director who is now a pro-life activist.


“Planned Parenthood has actively participated in illegal activity, selling the body parts of aborted babies in exchange for profit,” said Johnson. “They’ve lied to the very women they purport to fight for. I saw it first-hand when I worked for the abortion giant and yet, they still manage to obtain over half a billion dollars a year in our tax dollars.”

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced in 2016 that it recommended the FBI and DOJ investigate and possibly prosecute Planned Parenthood, some of its affiliates, and companies involved in the trafficking of young human body parts.

The U.S. House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives also made 15 criminal referrals against abortion companies including Planned Parenthood, universities, and fetal tissue companies.

Both committees had extensively investigated Planned Parenthood and the fetal tissue trade after the release of CMP’s shocking footage of abortion executives haggling over body parts, picking through dishes of tiny organs, and joking “it’s a boy!” about a freshly-aborted baby.


The videos showed the abortion industry admitting the humanity of preborn babies in the womb by discussing their brains, livers, and other organs.

“The stark evidence points to the need for this further Department of Justice investigation to uncover the entire truth about Planned Parenthood's sale of baby body parts,” said Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council. “The fact that DOJ is requesting unredacted information shows they are serious about its investigation.”

“Congress should immediately halt any money to the abortion giant until the FBI completes their investigation,” urged Johnson.

“We applaud the Department of Justice for finally moving towards investigating Planned Parenthood for their illegal and unethical behavior,” said Kristan Hawkins, President of Students for Life of America. She said taxpayers have had “enough” of funding the trafficking of human body parts and the commission of crimes.

“Given this investigation, Congress should refuse to give another cent of its over $400 billion in annual federal funding to Planned Parenthood,” said Perkins. “The Republican-controlled Congress did this in 2015 on a reconciliation bill with 51 Senate votes which Obama vetoed. They can do so again on a reconciliation bill now that there is a pro-life president in the White House.”

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY
Despite Republican majorities in the U.S. House, U.S. Senate, and White House – and many political promises to defund Planned Parenthood in 2017 – the abortion giant continues to receive massive amounts of tax dollars through Medicaid and Title X grants.

Daleiden noted that both Congressional investigations “confirmed that Planned Parenthood Federation of America, several of their biggest affiliates, and multiple business partners broke the law in a profit-driven scheme to commodify dismembered baby body parts.”

Daleiden has faced gag orders, lawsuits, and felony charges from the abortion industry and its political allies. The outcome of some of these has not yet been determined.


PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU THANKS TRUMP FOR HISTORIC DECISION

by Charles Russel

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday thanked President Donald Trump for his "historic decision" to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital, saying it will advance peace in the Middle East.

"President Trump, thank you for today's historic decision to recognize Jerusalem as Israel's capital," Netanyahu said in a video statement. "The Jewish people and the Jewish state will be forever grateful."

Netanyahu noted that Jerusalem "has been the capital of the Jewish people for 3,000 years" and the capital of Israel for nearly 70 years, describing how the city has been the focus of the Jewish people's "hopes, dreams, and prayers" for three millennia.

Netanyahu's comments came shortly after Trump officially recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, calling the move an "overdue step" for peace efforts between the Jewish state and the Palestinians. Trump also said that he is directing the State Department to make preparations to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY

Several world leaders, particularly from Europe and the Middle East, have criticized Trump's decision and said that it will lead to violence. Palestinian factions have called for "three days of rage" over the announcement.

"The president's decision is an important step towards peace, for there is no peace that doesn't include Jerusalem as the capital of the State of Israel," said Netanyahu, who called on all countries to join the U.S. in recognizing Jerusalem as Israel's capital and to move their embassies to the city.

Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to advancing peace with the Palestinians and all of Israel's neighbors, adding that the Israeli government will continue to work with the Trump administration "to make that dream of peace come true."

The prime minister also addressed specific concerns over Trump's remarks, making clear that "there will be no change whatsoever to the status quo at the holy sites" in Jerusalem.


"Israel will always ensure freedom of worship for Jews, Christians, and Muslims alike," Netanyahu said.

The Israeli leader called Trump's announcement "courageous" and said it will advance peace.

"We're profoundly grateful for the president for his courageous and just decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and to prepare for the opening of the U.S. embassy here," Netanyahu said. "This decision reflects the president's commitment to an ancient but enduring truth, to fulfilling his promises and to advancing peace."

 


"BIBLICAL TIMING OF ABSOLUTE PRECISION:" JOHN HAGEE PRAISES PRESIDENT TRUMP'S HISTORICAL JERUSALEM DECISION

by Mark Martin

Christians United for Israel founder Pastor John Hagee spoke on CBN News' Faith Nation program about why he supports President Donald Trump's Jerusalem decision and why Christians need to know about Israel's global importance.


Before President Trump officially recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and announced the U.S. Embassy in Israel would be moving there, pastor and New York Times best-selling author John Hagee joined CBN News' Faith Nation program today for analysis on the Jewish State.

He discussed why Israel is important to Christians, as well as what's behind the Trump administration's support of the Holy Land. Hagee is the founder and chairman of Christians United for Israel.


"What President Trump is doing is one of the most courageous political things that's been done in Washington in a long time," Hagee, who is also the senior pastor of Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Texas, told CBN News.

"Many presidents have promised to move the embassy and declare Jerusalem as the eternal capital, but they have promised without performing," he continued.

"President Trump, when I spoke to him in the White House about this several weeks ago, he said this very emphatically. He said, 'Other presidents have failed you, but I will not disappoint the Christian community in this issue. I will stand with Israel, and we will at some point in time, move the embassy,'" said Hagee.

He also talked with the president about the significance of moving the embassy in this "Jubilee Year."

"...I told him that God measures everything in modules of 50 years," Hagee explained to CBN News. "And I said this is a principle that's carried out in Leviticus, the 25th chapter."

"I said, 'If you look at 1917, it was a Jubilee Year, and the Balfour Amendment came, and then in 50 years, it was 1967, and Jerusalem was reconnected to Israel,'" he continued.

"'And you add 50 to 1967, and you're in 2017.' I said, 'This is the year to move the embassy and make that declaration because it is a biblical timing of absolute precision,'" Hagee said. "Thank God, he's going to do exactly that."

Hagee also emphasized the significance of the Jewish state to God and why Christians need to acknowledge its global importance.

"...I believe at this point in time, Israel is God's stopwatch for everything that happens to every nation, including America, from now until the Rapture of the Church and beyond," he said.

"Christians should care about Israel because the entirety of the Bible beginning at Genesis all the way to the end is God's position paper on the Jewish people," Hagee explained.

"God found a man by the name of Abraham and He made a covenant with him," Hagee continued. "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, recorded in the book of Genesis, that He was going to give them a strip of real estate in the Middle East, and that piece of real estate would be theirs forever."

"Forever means today, tomorrow and forever," he said. "It has nothing to do with what the Palestinians think, what the Russians think, what the UK has the opinion of; it belongs to the Jewish people."

"And Israel is the gateway to God's blessing in the Bible," Hagee continued. "Genesis 12: 'I will bless those who bless you.'"

"World history can be summed up in one sentence. The nations that blessed Israel were blessed of God, and the nations that cursed Israel were cursed of God," he said.

WATCH: 
President Trump statement on decision to recognize 
Jerusalem as Israel's capital




SUPREME COURT HEARS MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP ARGUMENTS

by Liberty McArtor
Arguments went longer than planned as justices took an active interest in the case.
Jack Phillips speaks to the media after leaving the Supreme Court which is hearing the 'Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission,' Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017, in Washington.
People lined up outside the U.S. Supreme Court while it was still dark Tuesday morning — joining some who had camped out — hoping to witness oral arguments in a highly-anticipated case involving free speech, religious freedom and same-sex marriage.

Jack Phillips, the defendant in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, owns Masterpiece Cakeshop in Denver, Colorado. In 2012, the devout Christian declined a request to make a cake for a same-sex wedding reception. Phillips has also denied other cake requests in the past when they violate his beliefs. They include cakes that celebrate Halloween or have vulgar messages, among others.

EARN MONEY FROM INTERNET $7000 MONTHLY
But the couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, complained to the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The commission then gave Phillips a list of orders, including that he make wedding cakes for same-sex unions. Since then, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) has represented Jack at every judicial level preceding the Supreme Court. The ACLU is representing Craig and Mullins.

First Impressions
“The hearing was very lively,” ADF president Michael Farris said directly after oral arguments. ADF live-streamed the press conference from the Supreme Court steps. Arguments were supposed to be an hour long. But they went longer “because there was so much interest on all sides of the case,” Farris said.

He added that Kristen Waggoner, the ADF attorney leading Phillips’ case, “did an absolutely great job.” Noel Francisco, U.S. Solicitor General, also argued Phillips’ case. The Justice Department filed an amicus brief on Phillips’ behalf. Colorado Solicitor General Frederick Yarger and ACLU attorney David Cole argued on behalf of Craig and Mullins.

“I think the court heard from four able lawyers,” Farris said. “But I believe at the end of the day we have a very good chance of prevailing in this case, but it’s going to be close.”

From The Defendant and the Plaintiffs
After the arguments, Phillips stepped up to the mic.

“I serve all who walk through my doors,” he said. “Though I serve everyone who comes into my shop, like many other creative professionals, I don’t create custom designs for events or messages that conflict with my conscience.”

Craig and Mullins also spoke to reporters and supporters.

“I believe at the end of the day we have a very good chance of prevailing in this case, but it’s going to be close.” — Michael Farris, President of ADF

“This entire time Dave and I have just been asking to be treated equally in public,” Craig said. “We’re two regular guys that just were wronged and decided to stand up for ourselves.”

“Dave and I do not have an agenda,” he added. “We all deserve fair and equal treatment, and that’s why we’re here today.”

During arguments, supporters of both sides held rallies outside the Supreme Court. Phillips’ supporters held signs reading “justice for Jack” and “love free speech.” Craig and Mullins’ supporters held signs reading “It’s not about the cake” and “open to all.” Various religious leaders and politicians joined each rally.

We’re here at the Supreme Court today voicing our support for Jack Phillips in a landmark First Amendment case, Masterpiece Cakeshop. 

Notes From the Courtroom
While video recordings are not allowed inside the Supreme Court, The Wall Street Journal provided notes of the arguments on its live blog. Of note are questions from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. She asked whether Phillips would refuse to sell pre-made products to Craig and Mullins. Waggoner maintained that he would not, since that didn’t constitute compelled speech.

Justice Elena Kagan asked what would happen if a baker refused to serve an interracial couple, or a disabled person, due to their religious beliefs. Waggoner responded by asserting that “Mr. Phillips is not basing his decisions on who his customers are, but what they are doing,” according to the Journal’s report.

The race comparison came up repeatedly. Both Waggoner and Fransicso argued that refusing to serve someone because of their race is different than what Phillips is asking for. Yarger argued it was similar.

Chief Justice John Roberts brought the race analogy up again when questioning Cole, noting differences between how the Supreme Court treated white supremacists and Americans with traditional beliefs about marriage. Cole noted that while the Obergefell decision legalizing same-sex marriage in 2015 treated those with traditional beliefs about marriage respectfully, it “did not say that businesses could turn away gay customers,” the Journal reported.

But the Justice causing the most stir is Anthony Kennedy, seen as a swing vote. As the Journal reported, he appeared critical of Colorado during questioning. From the Journal: “‘It seems to me the state has been neither tolerant or respectful’ of the baker’s views, he said.” The Journal reports that Cole later minimized the perceived criticism, saying, “that’s just how arguments go.”

For the entirety of the Journal’s notes from the arguments, click here. For C-SPAN video footage from outside the Supreme Court today, click here.


PRESIDENT TRUMP PROCLAIMS JESUS IS THE REASON FOR THE SEASON AT NATIONAL CHRISTMAS TREE LIGHTING

by CBN NEWS
Related image

President Trump lit the National Christmas Tree for the first time alongside Melania and thousands of revelers.

"As president of the United States it's my tremendous honor to finally wish America and the world a very merry Christmas," he said.

Click to Watch 

Trump counted down from 10 while Melania pushed a button that lit up the national tree with silver and gold stars.

It's a tradition that dates back nearly a century and started with President Calvin Coolidge in 1923.

"From the earliest days of our nation Americans have known Christmas is a time for prayer and worship, for gratitude and good will, for peace and renewal," President Trump said.

Thursday's celebration featured a number of musical performances, singing, and dancing. However, President Trump reminded the nation that Jesus is the real reason for the season.

"For Christians, this is a holy season, a celebration of the birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ," he said.

"The Christmas story began 2,000 years ago with a mother, a father, their baby son, and the most extraordinary gift of all  –  the gift of God's love for all of humanity," he continued. "Whatever our belief, we know that the birth of Jesus Christ and the story of this incredible life forever changed the course of human history. There is hardly an aspect of our life today that his life has not touched  – art, music, culture, law, and our respect for the sacred dignity of every person everywhere in the world."

He explained that Christmas isn't about presents, but celebrating our unique identity.

"Each and every year at Christmas time we recognize that the real spirit of Christmas is not what we have, it's about who we are. Each one of us is a child of God. That is the true source of joy this time of year," President Trump said. "That is what we remember during today's beautiful ceremony. That we are called to serve one another, to love one another, and to pursue peace in our hearts and all throughout the world."

President Trump ended by asking God for his blessings.

"This Christmas we ask for God's blessings for our family and for our nation."



WHY THE MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP CASE MATTERS TO ALL AMERICANS

By MICHAEL BROWN 
In this Sept. 1, 2016, photo, Jack Phillips, owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, stands for a portrait near a display of wedding cakes at his store in Lakewood, Colo.
Should a gay baker be required by law to design a cake with the message, “God hates fags”? Should an African American t-shirt maker be required to design a t-shirt saying, “Long live the KKK?” Should a Muslim caterer be required to provide pork for a secular event? Should a Jewish photographer be forced to shoot a wedding on the Sabbath? The answer to all these questions is: Of course not. Why, then, should a Christian baker be required by law to design a cake celebrating the “wedding” of two women (or men)?

That is the big question the Supreme Court will be answering next week when it hears the Masterpiece Cakes case involving Christian baker Jack Phillips.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, which is defending Phillips, has pointed out the following:

1. “Jack does not discriminate.” He was perfectly happy to sell the gay couple, who subsequently took him to court, cookies and brownies and anything else pre-made off of his shelves.

2. “Jack has turned down other cakes in the past,” including Halloween cakes and lewd cakes.

3. “Jack has faced anti-religious bigotry as well as threats and intimidation simply because he declined to promote an event.” So he is the one being singled out for unfair treatment.

4. “Jack owns a private family business, and he doesn’t give up his rights when he sells his art.” And  by calling his business “Masterpiece Cakes,” he is making clear that for him, they are works of art. 

5.  Accordingly, “Jack’s shop has been called an ‘art gallery of cakes.’” And…

6. “Wedding cakes made up about 40 percent of Jack’s business,” and these are all custom designed. But due to Colorado’s laws and legal rulings to date, he has had to drop this part of his business        entirely.

This Should be a No-Brainer
Now, common sense would say that this case should be a no-brainer — a slam-dunk win for Jack Phillips and his attorneys. And in principle, I agree. The problem, however, is that “gay rights” have been exalted to such a degree that these “rights” trump all other rights and freedoms — including our freedoms of conscience, speech and religion.

In the case at hand, because Phillips is a committed Christian, he doesn’t make cases mixed with alcohol (nor can he be required to), he doesn’t make cakes for lewd bachelor parties (nor can he be required to), and he doesn’t make cakes for horror-themed events (nor can he be required to). But when he cannot, in good conscience, use his artistic skills to make a cake for a same-sex “wedding,” he can be charged with violating the state’s anti-discrimination laws to the point that the state can now discriminate against him as a Christian.

Put another way, you can freely exercise your Christian beliefs unless those beliefs offend gays. In that case, you’re breaking the law.

And what if a Hindu came in and wanted a “Krishna is Lord” cake? Phillips could politely decline, without legal penalty or pressure. The same with a Muslim baker declining to bake a cake for a Christian with the words, “Jesus is Lord.”

But wouldn’t that offend the Hindu and the Christian wanting to buy the cakes? Perhaps so, but the bakers are rightly protected by the law and cannot be penalized for refusing the business.

Why, then, are gays and lesbians treated differently? Why are they put in a special category?

The sympathetic answer would be that society has overcompensated for perceived past injustices. And so, the pendulum has swung from one side (mistreatment of gays and lesbians) to the other side (overprotection of gays and lesbians).

The more realistic answer is that some gay activists have always had the ultimate goal of silencing those who resist their cause.

Freedom of Conscience Hangs in the Balance
As I’ve said for more than a decade, those who came out of the closet want to put us in the closet. And as a Christian attorney once commented to me, “Those who were once put in jail want to put us in jail.”

If the Supreme Court finds him guilty, the implications for America will be massive.

In the days ahead, many on the left will argue that Phillips was guilty of discriminating against gay customers. But that is a complete misrepresentation of the facts, and if the Supreme Court finds him guilty, the implications for America will be massive.

It will mean that the highest court in the land has ruled that, in virtually all conceivable cases, gay rights trump religious rights. And it will mean that Christians in particular can be forced to violate their consciences and their deeply held, historic beliefs under penalty of law, with the real potential of losing their very livelihoods. And should they still refuse to comply, it could mean a jail sentence too.

While some on the left (including LGBT activists) will say, “This is not what we intended,” plenty of others will gloat. After all, if we deserved to be thrown to the lions in one generation, it’s no big of a deal to imprison us in another generation.

I’m hoping that the Supreme Court does the right thing. If not, my leftist readers may mock my words today, but you will mark them tomorrow.