SPRINGFIELD, MO, VOTERS REPEAL “ANTI-DISCRIMINATION” ORDINANCE

by BSU
Following a fierce clash between LGBT advocates and religious conservatives, the citizens of Springfield, Mo., have repealed a controversial anti-discrimination bill that would have forced business owners to service gay weddings and allowed transgendered men access to women’s bathrooms.

Last fall, the city council of Springfield passed the controversial bill despite protests from citizens. The law banned discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity in housing, employment and public accommodations. It also extended nondiscrimination rules already on the books based on race, creed, sex and disability, specifically related to the sale of real estate and private homes.

According to the campaign to repeal the law, “Anyone claiming to be transgender [has] the right to choose which public locker room, dressing room, bathroom, or other previously gender specific area they wish to use. This new, special privilege opens a door for sexual predators to claim being transgender in order to access these private areas.”

Additionally, under the ordinance, a private homeowner could not refuse to sell their home to another person due to any of the above-stated reasons. In doing so, they would be guilty of discrimination and liable to prosecution.

Citizens began a petition drive, which resulted in a public vote held last week that repealed the ordinance.

Why It Matters
The effort to take away the right of homeowners to sell or refuse to sell their property to whomever they wish is possibly the grossest infringement of rights to date. And while supporters of the bill scoff at the fear of peeping toms, the fact remains that currently, if a man is found in the women’s restroom, security can remove him. Under the proposed ordinance, that would be impossible.

Take Action
Let the good people of Springfield know that you applaud their actions. Contact city council members and tell them you support Springfield’s vote.


THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING
FREEDOM

TEENAGE GIRL TAKES DOWN ATHEIST GROUP OVER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

by Barbwire
The atheist group fighting to remove “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance said Monday it will not appeal a court’s previous ruling against it.

“I’m so grateful to know that I will be able to continue reciting the Pledge in peace,” Samantha Jones, a senior at Highland Regional High School in Blackwood, N.J., said in a statement. “The phrase ‘under God’ protects all Americans—including atheists—because it reminds the government that it can’t take away basic human rights because it didn’t create them.”

Jones became the face of the fight to preserve the phrase, speaking publicly and on television in support of it.

This is the second time in two years a state court has denied the American Humanist Association’s attempt to remove the phrase from the pledge. A similar case in Massachusetts was rejected by the court last year.

“The American Humanist Association’s challenge turned out to be all bark and no bite,” Diana Verm, legal counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, said in a statement.

The AHA told The Daily Caller News Foundation it will not appeal, but did not have anyone available for further comment. The AHA originally argued “under God” is a theological statement improper for the classroom because it discriminates against atheist students.

The original version of the pledge did not include the phrase “under God,” which was added in 1954 by Congress.

“They are not trying to win liberty for themselves, they are trying to censor the pledge of allegiance for everybody else,” Mike Farris, chancellor of Patrick Henry College and chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association, told TheDCNF.


THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING
FREEDOM